| Brundridge et.al v. Fluor Federal Services, et. al |
Benton County Case No. 99-2-01250-7.Eleven plaintiff whistleblower case finally brought to trial after extensive delays. Plaintiffs called more than 50 witnesses, most of whom where company employees who were hostile to the plaintiffs. Some of the plaintiffs are pipe fitters who had been laid off for refusing to install an underrated valve in a system that would ultimately carry nuclear waste. Other plaintiffs were pipe fitters who spoke up in support of the original plaintiffs. The jury awarded over $4.7 million in damages. See jury verdict form, and newspaper coverage of the closing arguments and the verdict. Plaintiffs were awarded and additional $1.5 million in attorney fees. See press coverage (Seattle Post Intelligencer and Tri-Cities Herald) See the attorney fee judgment and the order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the case.

|
| Cole v. King County |
King County Case No. 92-2-05963-1. Disability discrimination case brought under state law. Jury verdict of approximately $187,000.00.

|
| Duggan v. American Remodeling Inc. |
Sexual harassment case brought under state and federal law. Case involved classic sexual harassment at work by supervisor. Confidential settlement.

|
| Fadaie v. Alaska Air |
Federal District Court, Seattle, No. C03-2421L. Whistleblower case brought by former maintenance supervisor alleging he was fired after he challenged management’s assertions to the FAA that a tool conformity audit ordered by the FAA following the crash of Flight 261 in January 2000, had been completed. As part of settlement, company CEO agreed to sign letter of apology to Mr. Fadaie (look for typo). Other terms are confidential. See newspaper articles: Seattle Post Intelligencer and Seattle Times.

|
| Farhamy v. Publicis, Inc. |
King County Superior Court No. 03-2-22133-3 SEA, suit for discriminatory termination based on religion; confidential settlement in 2004.

|
| Goh v. American President Lines, LTD., |
King County Superior Court No. 02-2-29670-0 SEA, suit for discriminatory termination and denial of promotion based on race; confidential settlement with Plaintiff Goh in 2004 after Defendants' motion for summary judgment based on signed waiver was denied. Summary judgment based on signed waiver was granted against Co-Plaintiff Nishiyama, and we are appealing that decision.

|
| Gonzalez v. University of Washington |
Same sex sexual harassment case brought under state law. Case involved harassment by supervisor. Confidential settlement.

|
| Hairston v. City of Seattle |
King County Case No. 95-2-01141-1SEA. Race discrimination, harassment, and retaliation case brought under state law. Jury verdict of $400,000.00 for emotional distress. Plaintiff employed by City at time of trial.

|
| Ibarbia-Ifft v. Peninsula College |
Tacoma Fed. Dist. Ct. No. C97-5134FDB. National origin/race discrimination case brought under federal and state civil rights laws. Case involved failure to grant tenure to Philippine professor. Case settled for $250,000.00.

|
| Lawrence v. Key Arena/ City of Seattle and Garth Brooks |
King County Superior Court No. 99-2-07990-6 SEA. This is another disability access case brought on behalf of Joanne Lawrence, who is an advocate for the disabled. Key Arena settled the case and made the improvements sought by Ms. Lawrence. Garth Brooks was dismissed prior to trial. Another good fight for equal public access.

|
| Lawrence v. Tacoma Dome |
Tacoma Fed. Dist. Ct. No. C96-5745RJB. Disability access case that settled before trial resulting in consent decree requiring Tacoma Dome to make significant changes to accommodate disabled patrons under a timetable with ongoing court supervision.

|
| Lockwood v. Office of Administrative Hearings, State of Washington |
King County Case No. 96-2-30410-7SEA. Disability discrimination case brought under state law involving client with chemical sensitivity. Case settled for $250,000.00.

|
| Martini v. Boeing |
137 Wash. 2d 357, 971 P.2d 45 (1999); 88 Wash. App. 442, 945 P.2d 248 (Div. I, 1997); King County Case No. 93-2-17162-5. Disability discrimination case brought under state law. Jury Verdict of approximately $776,000.00. Total recovery +$1.4 million.

|
| Nonog v. City of Seattle |
King County Case No.03-2-15614-1 SEA , is a race discrimination case brought against Seattle City Light. Mr. Nonog, who is a Filipino American, was passed over for promotion in favor of a less qualified Caucasian then required to train the new hire. His job duties were curtailed over time and his position was eventually eliminated.
The City agreed to have judgment entered against the defendants for $200,000.00 plus attorney fees rather than have the case proceed to trial (click here for offer of judgement). Mr. Demello was also moved out of his position owing to his race, but his case was dismissed on summary judgment because he signed a waiver as part of a civil service appeal. We are appealing that issue in several cases and seeking to have the Supreme Court overturn that reasoning.

|
| Pham and Lara v. Seattle City Light |
King County Case No. 97-2-11669-4 SEA. Race discrimination case brought under state law. Jury verdict of more than $550,000.00 prejudgment interest of more than $37,000, court-awarded attorney fees and costs of over $339,000.
In March 2003, the trial judge awarded an additional $168,000 to compensate the plaintiffs for the additional tax burden of the verdict and attorney fees pursuant to Blaney v. International Assn. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 114 Wn. App. 80; 55 P.3d 1208 (2002).

|
| Trinh Rodriguez & Bailey v. Seattle City Light, King County |
King County Case No. 04-2-26460-0 SEA, Three plaintiff race discrimination/hostile work environment case against Seattle City Light, which is a public utility and a department of the City of Seattle. After a 6 week trial, jury awarded Trinh and Bailey $1.48 million in damages. Later, judge awarded plaintiffs more than $700,000.00 in attorney fees and costs. The City has appealed the jury’s verdict.
Click here to view trial coverage by the Seattle Times and Seattle Post Intelligencer. Click here to view the Trinh judgment and verdict and the Bailey judgment and verdict documents.
Mr. Rodriquez’ case concluded before trial after the City filed an “Offer of Judgment” for $125,000, which allows a defendant to offer a sum of money in exchange for having a judgment entered against them for the amount offered. Under Court Rules, the plaintiff does not have to take the offer, but Mr. Rodriguez chose to do so. Click here to view the Rodriguez judgment.

|